PDS_VERSION_ID = PDS3
RECORD_TYPE = STREAM
OBJECT = TEXT
PUBLICATION_DATE = " "
NOTE = "Experiment description for the
Experiments at Earth1 and Earth2 Gravity
Assists conducted in 1990 (DOY 333 through
DOY 344 for Earth1), and in 1992 (DOY 229
through DOY 346 for Earth2). Formatted for
display or printing with up to 78 constant-
width characters per line."
END_OBJECT = TEXT
END
Coherent Doppler and ranging data were generated by the DSN for the two
Galileo gravity assists during Earth flybys on 8 December 1990 (Earth1) and
8 December 1992 (Earth2). The original scientific objective of using these
data was to improve the determination of Earth's mass ME (M sub E) in the
form GME (GM sub E), where G is the laboratory determined gravitational
constant. However during the data analysis phase, it was discovered that it
is not possible to fit the data at Earth1 without somehow accounting for the
fact that the spacecraft picked up orbital energy during the flyby. For
example, a good fit can be obtained by introducing a fictitious instantaneous
velocity increase of about 4 mm s^(-1) at perigee along the direction of
motion. Numerous data fits using various subsets of Doppler and ranging data,
sometimes both range and Doppler, sometimes Doppler only, and sometimes
ranging only, all point to the same conclusion; the outgoing Galileo
trajectory has more orbital energy than the incoming trajectory. This is
theoretically impossible in a conservative gravitational field, even taking
into account the noninertial dynamical situation introduced by longitudinal
gravity harmonics undergoing Earth rotation. In an attempt to understand
this anomalous behavior, the Tracking and Data Relay Satellite (TDRSS) was
successfully used to track the Galileo spacecraft during Earth2. This filled
in an unaviodable gap in DSN coverage for about two hours surrounding
perigee. The similar gap at Earth1 amounted to about 1.2 hours.
Fits to a combination of DSN data and TDRSS data reveal that there
are significant systematic effects in the post-fit TDRSS residuals. However,
the lower altiude for Earth2 (303 km as opposed to 960 km for Earth1), and
the considerable uncertainty in atmospheric drag models at the lower altitude,
make it impossible to determine if an orbital energy increase indeed occurred
during the Earth2 flyby. Also, by leaving the TDRSS data out of the fit, and
by including an atmospheric drag parameter, it is possible to fit the Earth2
DSN data to the noise level. Hence it is not known whether the difficulty in
fitting the TDRSS data is caused by unmodeled physical effects or by flawed
TDRSS data. As expected, the inclusion of a drag paramenter in the fit to
the Earth1 DSN data results in a non-physical positive drag acceleration along
the direction of motion. Based on numerous numerical tests, the possibility
of software bugs is deemed extremely unlikely for both the Earth1 and Earth2
fits.
|