Galileo EPD Pre-Jupiter Raw Bundle Galileo EPD Pre-Jupiter Edited Raw Earth1 Count Rate Data Collection PDS3 DATA_SET_ID = GO-E-EPD-2-SAMP-EARTH1-PAD-V1.0 PDS3 DATA_SET_NAME = GO EARTH EPD EDITED SAMPLE EARTH1 PITCH ANGLE DIST V1.0 START_TIME = 1990-12-08T06:00:12 STOP_TIME = 1990-12-08T23:58:51 PDS3 DATA_SET_RELEASE_DATE = 1995-02-22 PRODUCER_FULL_NAME = CHRISTOPHER R. BRULL References: GO EARTH EPD EDITED SAMPLE EARTH1 PITCH ANGLE DIST V1.0, GO-E-EPD-2-SAMP-EARTH1-PAD-V1.0, NASA Planetary Data System, 1995 These data were originally archived in the following PDS3 data set: GO-E-EPD-2-SAMP-EARTH1-PAD-V1.0 (https://doi.org/10.17189/1519637). Collection Overview ================= This collection contains count rate data for the energetic particle detector obtained from the LEMMS and CMS telescopes during the time of significant activity during the Earth1 encounter on day 342, 1990. A data file record contains count rate data for a particular LEMMS or CMS channel. Also included are pitch and phase angles of the particles counted by the detectors. The angles are determined in a coordinate system defined by the magnetic field (magnetic field data provided by Steve Joy) and the position of Earth (calculated with SPICE kernel data). The z-axis of the coordinate system points along the magnetic field. The x-axis is chosen so Earth lies in the xz plane. The pitch angle is the angle between the sector look direction and the z-axis. The phase angle is the angle between x-axis and the projection of the x-axis on the xy plane. During the encounter, the stepper motor was moving from position zero thru five. Steps one through five are reported in this collection. The rates reported are in units of counts/sec. Pitch and phase angles are recorded in radians. NOTE Data in this collection includes only that data which has valid data flag markers as a result of processing done by the Galileo Energetic Particles Detector Archive Processor. Invalid data are marked by a -1.0 in the rate column of the invalid data. Depending on the tools used for EPD data analysis, it is possible to encounter the pitch angle of the detector being substituted for the pitch angle of the charged particles. For example, in Figure 4 of Williams et al. (1998), J. Geophys. Res., 103, 17,523-17,534, the authors show a loss at 0 deg PA, which if viewed carefully must be at 180 deg PA. It is therefore useful to exercise caution with pitch angles in the EPD data, depending on how the data are obtained.